Prime

Gagnez des jetons pour vos contributions.

Gagne ta part de 1000 Sui

Gagne des points de réputation et obtiens des récompenses pour avoir aidé la communauté Sui à se développer.

Publications

Filtrer :Toutes les communautés

Prime+10
Peera Admin31
PourMoveMar 11, 2025
Questions et Réponses avec des Experts
Sui Move vs Aptos Move - What is the difference?
Sui Move and Aptos Move - two prominent implementations of the Move programming language. While both are rooted in the same foundational principles, they have diverged significantly in design, execution, and ecosystem development. To better understand their differences, we need to uncover some of their key aspects: How do their runtimes differ? Both Sui and Aptos implement their own custom Move virtual machines (VMs). How does this impact performance, scalability, and developer experience? For instance: Does Sui's runtime optimize for parallel execution differently than Aptos'? Are there notable differences in transaction lifecycle management or gas models? What are the differences between their standard libraries? The Move standard library is a critical component for building smart contracts. However, Sui and Aptos have forked their implementations, leading to divergence: Are there modules or functions unique to one implementation but absent in the other? How do these differences affect common use cases like token creation, NFTs, or decentralized finance (DeFi)? How does data storage differ between them? One of the most significant distinctions lies in how Sui and Aptos handle data storage: Sui uses an object-centric model, where each object has its own ownership and permissions. Aptos, on the other hand, retains a more traditional account-based model similar to Ethereum. How does this impact state management, composability, and gas efficiency? Is it fair to say that Aptos is closer to EVM while Sui is closer to SVM? Some developers argue that Aptos' account-based architecture resembles Ethereum's EVM, while Sui's object-centric approach aligns more closely with Solana's SVM. Do you agree with this analogy? Why or why not? How does this architectural choice influence developer ergonomics and application design? Are there universal packages working for both Sui Move and Aptos Move? Given their shared origins, it would be ideal if some libraries or tools were interoperable across both ecosystems. Are there any existing universal packages or frameworks that work seamlessly on both platforms? If not, what are the main barriers to achieving compatibility? Can one of them be transpiled into another? If a project is built on Sui Move, could it theoretically be transpiled to run on Aptos Move, or vice versa? What are the technical challenges involved in such a process? Are there tools or compilers currently available to facilitate this kind of migration?
- Move
2
1
Meilleure réponse
Prime+10
Peera Admin36
PourSuiMar 05, 2025
Questions et Réponses avec des Experts
« Erreurs de vérification de sources multiples » dans les publications du module Sui Move - Résolution automatique des erreurs
Les développeurs travaillant avec Sui Move rencontrent fréquemment des problèmes liés à des « erreurs de vérification de sources multiples détectées » lorsqu'ils tentent de publier ou de mettre à niveau des modules. Ces erreurs sont dues à des incohérences entre les dépendances locales et leurs homologues en chaîne, ce qui entraîne des échecs de publication et des problèmes de déploiement. Vous trouverez ci-dessous un exemple consolidé des erreurs auxquelles les développeurs sont confrontés : Failed to publish the Move module(s), reason: [warning] Multiple source verification errors found: Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::vec_set Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::vec_map Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001::MoveStdlib::bit_vector Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001::MoveStdlib::ascii Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::hex Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::zklogin_verified_id Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::prover Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::coin Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::dynamic_field Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::transfer On-chain version of dependency Sui::zklogin_verified_id was not found. On-chain version of dependency Sui::zklogin_verified_issuer was not found. Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::tx_context Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::transfer_policy Local dependency did not match its on-chain version at 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002::Sui::kiosk Ce problème se pose souvent pour les raisons suivantes : Versions incompatibles entre l'environnement de développement local (par exemple, Sui CLI) et l'état de la chaîne. Différences dans la configuration des packages entre les réseaux (par exemple, Mainnet contre Testnet). Dépendances manquantes ou obsolètes dans l'environnement en chaîne. Questions clés Comment pouvons-nous automatiser la détection et la résolution de ces incohérences de dépendance pendant le processus de publication ? Quels outils ou scripts peuvent être développés pour garantir que les dépendances locales s'alignent toujours sur leurs homologues en chaîne ? Existe-t-il un moyen de rationaliser ce processus en intégrant des contrôles de dépendance dans les pipelines CI/CD existants ou en améliorant le SDK Sui ? Votre tâche consiste à proposer une solution qui réponde à ces défis, en garantissant des déploiements plus fluides et plus fiables pour les développeurs de Sui Move. N'oubliez pas de publier votre solution ci-dessous.
- Sui
- SDKs and Developer Tools
4
1
Meilleure réponse